← Search

Reference 1621

Mitchell, Todd Andrew (1997)

AuthorsMitchell, Todd Andrew
Year1997
Pages147 pp.
GeoRef1999-028972
Keywordsabsolute age; Big Smoky Creek Stock; Cenozoic; chemical composition;dacites; dates; Eocene; genesis; geochemistry; granites;granodiorites; hydrothermal alteration; Idaho; Idaho Batholith;igneous rocks; intrusions; isotopes; magmas; major elements; metals;metasomatism; minerals; O-18/O-16; oxygen; Paleogene; partial melting;petrography; plutonic rocks; plutons; Precambrian; Proterozoic; rareearths; Rb/Sr; stable isotopes; stocks; Tertiary; textures; traceelements; United States; upper Precambrian; volcanic rocks

Abstract

The Eocene Big Smoky Creek Stock is one of many shallow graniticplutons located along the eastern margin of the Idaho Batholith insouth-central Idaho. The Big Smoky Creek Stock is a homogeneous bodyof medium grained, hornblende-biotite granite. The granite suite isuniform mineralogically and texturally. The granite is closely relatedtemporally and spatially with a dacite-granodiorite suite which formsa hypabyssal-plutonic complex surrounding the Big Smoky Creek Stock.The dacite-granodiorite suite is a quartz monzodiorite to granite andcomprises numerous gradational dikes and plutons. Previous work andfield relations have shown the dacite-granodiorite to be older andthat the two suites have different parent magmas. The BSCS wasaffected by hydrothermal activity after crystallization, based onoxygen isotopes. This activity did not affect Sr since Rb-Sr datingreturns ages of approximately 50 Ma, similar to previous ages in thearea. The suites have an anorogenic origin with partial meltingcompletely within the middle to lower continental crust facilitated byan extensional regime prior to and during the emplacement of the twosuites. Major, trace and REE suggest different sources for the twosuites non-co-magmatic. Radiogenic isotopes suggest the sourceregion was the lower crust with the dacite-granodiorite sourceslightly deeper than the granite source, although mixing ofdacite-granodiorite sources can not be ruled out. Oxygen isotopic datasuggest minor, if any, upper crustal contamination. The source rocksare possibly granulite rocks of Proterozoic age. Thesegranulite-facies rocks appear to have limited to absent garnet in theresidue. REE suggest limited plagioclase in the dacite-granodiorite'ssource residue and larger amounts of plagioclase in the granite'ssource residue. A mafic amphibolite facies source is suggested for thedacite-granodiorite and a more felsic source for the granite. Pb andNd model ages determined sources of Proterozoic age. Successful REEmodelling from a greywacke source suggests Proterozoic metasedimentaryrocks Belt Supergroup as a possible source component for the granitesuite.

44 samples from this reference

SampleRock nameMajorTraceIsotope
TAM 42Dacite yesyesyes
TAM 41Granite yesyes
TAM 38Dacite yesyes
TAM 39Granite yesyes
TAM 37Granite yesyesyes
TAM 28Dacite yesyes
TAM 26Granite yesyes
TAM 27Aplite yesyes
TAM 24Dacite yesyes
TAM 23Aplite yesyes
TAM 29Dacite yesyesyes
TAM 19Dacite yesyes
TAM 20Dacite yesyes
TAM 21Dacite yesyes
TAM 22Dacite yesyes
TAM 30Granite yesyes
TAM 33Dacite yesyes
TAM 32Dacite yesyes
TAM 47Dacite yesyes
TAM 31Granite yesyesyes
TAM 48Granite yesyesyes
TAM 45Granite yesyes
TAM 43Granite yesyesyes
TAM 44Aplite yesyes
TAM 34Granite yesyes
TAM 35Granite yesyes
TAM 36Granite yesyesyes
TAM 13Granite yesyesyes
TAM 14Granite yesyes
TAM 15Aplite yesyes
TAM 17Dacite yesyes
TAM 18Granite yesyesyes
TAM 7Granite yesyes
TAM 6Granite yesyesyes
TAM 5Aplite yesyes
TAM 4Dacite yesyes
TAM 2Granite yesyes
TAM 3Granite yesyes
TAM 1Dacite yesyes
TAM 12Granite yesyes
TAM 11Pegmatite yesyes
TAM 10Dacite yesyes
TAM 9Dacite yesyes
TAM 8Dacite yesyes